Get more tokens, every trade
Competitor Tests – Why Altcoinist Wins

🏆 The Bottom Line
Altcoinist delivers 2–16x better execution than competitors.
Based on 400+ independent trades across 6 tokens and 2 months of testing, every competitor we tested surrendered significantly more capital per trade compared to Altcoinist's smart routing powered by Definitive.fi.
More tokens, every trade.
What was tested:
7 trading platforms (Altcoinist, Maestro, BasedBot, Sigma, Banana Gun, Uniswap, MetaMask)
400+ trades across 5 test rounds over 2 months
6 different tokens: VIRTUALS, AERO, ALTT, EDGE, SQDGN, TIBBIR
5 trade sizes: 0.01 ETH, 0.05 ETH, 0.1 ETH, 0.2 ETH, 0.5 ETH
Methodology: Pure execution quality measured as percentage deviation between expected and actual tokens/ETH received, adjusted for platform fees. Lower is better.
Fee Treatment: All Telegram bots charge ~1% trading fee. Uniswap charges 0.25%, MetaMask charges 0.875%. Our execution measurements isolate the slippage/routing quality BEYOND these fees for fair comparison.
Based on 400+ independent trades. Full data available for verification.
Available here → Competitor Test Databases
Independent verification:
All trades executed in identical market conditions
Tokens selected for diverse liquidity and volatility profiles
Price snapshots captured from DexScreener at execution time
Expected vs actual execution measured to 5 decimal places
Testing conducted across November 25-27 and December 13-23, 2025
Failed/skipped trades factored into competitor scores
Calculation
Lower execution loss = better routing = more tokens in your wallet.
🎯 Execution Quality: Altcoinist Dominates
How much value does each platform lose beyond their stated fee? Lower execution loss = better routing.
Platform
Execution Score
vs Altcoinist
Win Rate
🥇 Altcoinist
100/100
Baseline
74%
🥈 Maestro
59/100
1.7x worse
67%
🥉 MetaMask
38/100
2.6x worse
61%
4th - BasedBot
22/100
4.5x worse
41%
5th - Sigma
18/100
5.6x worse†
59%
6th - Uniswap
8/100
12x worse†
59%
7th - Banana Gun
6/100
16x worse
24%
† Sigma and Uniswap scores adjusted for trades they couldn't complete due to routing failures
💵 The 74% Win Rate
What percentage of trades execute with minimal slippage (<0.5% execution loss)? Higher = more consistent quality.
Platform
Trades <0.5% Loss
Win Rate
Gap to Altcoinist
Altcoinist
50 of 68
74%
—
Maestro
24 of 36
67%
-7%
MetaMask
22 of 36
61%
-13%
Sigma
40 of 68
59%
-15%
Uniswap
19 of 32
59%
-15%
BasedBot
29 of 70
41%
-33%
Banana Gun
16 of 68
24%
-50%
3 out of 4 Altcoinist trades execute with minimal slippage. Banana Gun? Only 1 in 4.
📉 Catastrophic Loss Rate: The Risk You Don't See
How often does each platform badly fail? These are trades where routing went wrong, costing you 3%, 5%, or even 10%+ beyond the platform fee.
Platform
3%+ Loss
5%+ Loss
10%+ Loss
Worst Trade
Altcoinist
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
No trade over 2%
MetaMask
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
BasedBot
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Uniswap
6.2%
3.1%
0.0%
7.3%
Maestro
8.3%
5.6%
0.0%
6.7%
Sigma
10.3%
4.4%
1.5%
10.4%
Banana Gun
13.2%
8.8%
4.4%
69.3%
Altcoinist: Zero trades over 2% execution loss. Closest bot competitor – BasedBot: 5.7% rate of 3%+ losses.
🚧 What Competitors Cost You
Extra capital lost compared to Altcoinist at various trading volumes.
Your Volume
Maestro
MetaMask
BasedBot
Sigma
Uniswap
Banana Gun
$10,000
-$13
-$31
-$67
-$88
-$217
-$283
$50,000
-$65
-$155
-$335
-$440
-$1,085
-$1,415
$100,000
-$130
-$310
-$670
-$880
-$2,170
-$2,830
$500,000
-$650
-$1,550
-$3,350
-$4,400
-$10,850
-$14,150
$1,000,000
-$1,300
-$3,100
-$6,700
-$8,800
-$21,700
-$28,300
Active traders: Trading $100K/month? Altcoinist keeps $130 to $2,830 more in your wallet compared to competitors. Every. Single. Month.
📈 Sell Execution: Where Altcoinist Shines Brightest
Taking profits matters. This is what you’re losing when exiting a position…
Platform
Sell Execution Loss
vs Altcoinist
Altcoinist
0.04%
Baseline (nearly perfect)
Maestro
0.21%
5x worse
Uniswap
0.32%
8x worse
BasedBot
0.42%
10x worse
MetaMask
0.59%
15x worse
Sigma
0.73%
18x worse
Banana Gun
3.95%
99x worse
Altcoinist's sell execution is nearly perfect at +0.04%. When you're taking profits, every basis point matters.
🎯 Consistency: Predictable Results, Every Trade
How much does execution quality vary from trade to trade? Higher score = more predictable.
Platform
Consistency Score
Interpretation
Altcoinist
100/100
Most predictable
MetaMask
79/100
Good
BasedBot
49/100
Variable
Uniswap
47/100
Unpredictable
Maestro
41/100
Variable
Sigma
31/100
Very unpredictable
Banana Gun
8/100
Extremely erratic
With Altcoinist, you know what to expect. With others, it's a gamble every time…
🚧 Routing Failures: Trades Competitors Couldn't Complete
Some platforms simply can't execute certain trades.
Platform
Failed Trade
What Happened
Uniswap
EDGE SELL 0.5 ETH
Would have lost 64% — skipped to avoid catastrophic loss
Sigma
EDGE BUY 0.5 ETH
16% price impact — marked invalid, couldn't route
Altcoinist
—
All trades completed successfully ✓
Altcoinist routes trades others can't. No failed transactions. No skipped trades and profits.
⏲️ Speed vs Execution: The Trade-off
Fast bots prioritize speed. Smart bots prioritize your wallet.
Platform
Approach
Execution Score
The Reality
Fast Bots
Rush to block
6-22/100
Speed, but massive capital leak
Altcoinist
Smart routing
100/100
Seconds longer = thousands saved
The math is simple: Fast bots race to be first to the block. Smart routing takes a few extra seconds to find the best price—keeping more tokens in your wallet.
When speed matters: For time-critical arbitrage or pool sniping, faster bots exist. For everything else, Altcoinist keeps more of your capital working for you.
🏆 Who Should Use Altcoinist?
✅ Active daily traders — Savings compound dramatically at volume
✅ Large position traders — Execution quality advantage scales with trade size
✅ Dollar-cost averaging strategies — Consistent savings on regular buys
✅ Long-term holders — Better entry/exit prices = better returns
✅ MEV-sensitive traders — Lower slippage = less MEV extraction
✅ Profit-takers — Near-perfect sell execution (+0.04%)
❌ Not ideal for: Arbitrage traders, front-running strategies, pool snipers
💎 The Altcoinist Advantage
Smart routing — Finds the best liquidity across multiple sources via Definitive.fi
Stealth Trading — Avoids wallet trackers & front-runners with untraceable trades
Near-perfect sells — +0.04% execution loss on sells (99x better than worst competitor)
Zero catastrophic trades — 0% of trades over 3% execution loss
MEV resistance — Better execution = less value leaked to MEV
Predictable results — Highest consistency score of any platform
The result: More tokens, every single trade. 74% win rate. Proven across 400+ trades.
🖊️ Summary
Metric
Altcoinist
Competitor Range
Altcoinist Advantage
Execution Score
100/100
6-59/100
2-16x better
Win Rate
74%
24-67%
+7 to +50% higher
Catastrophic Loss Rate (3%+)
0%
0-13.2%
Zero bad trades
Sell Execution
+0.04%
+0.21% to +3.95%
5-99x better
Consistency
100/100
8-79/100
Most predictable
Failed Trades
0
Multiple
Wider DEX support
At $100K Volume
vs Competitor
Extra You Keep with Altcoinist
vs Maestro
+$130
vs MetaMask
+$310
vs BasedBot
+$670
vs Sigma
+$880
vs Uniswap
+$2,170
vs Banana Gun
+$2,830
✅ Data Transparency
Test Periods
Period
Dates
Platforms
Trade Sizes
Trades
November 2025
Nov 25-27
Altcoinist, Maestro, Sigma, BasedBot, Banana Gun
0.01, 0.05, 0.2 ETH
179
December 2025
Dec 13-23
Altcoinist, Uniswap, MetaMask, Sigma, BasedBot, Banana Gun
0.05, 0.1, 0.5 ETH
232
Altcoinist Performance Over Time
Period
Execution Loss
Trades
November 2025
+0.03%
36
December 2025
+0.37%
32
Combined
+0.19%
68
Consistent performance across different market conditions.
Based on 400+ independent trades over 2 months.
Full data available for verification.
Available here → Competitor Test Databases
Test conducted November 2025. Performance data verified. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Trading involves risk.
Last updated